Bar chart — Public and private health spending as a percentage of GDP in six countries
📄 Bài mẫu band 8–9
| Introduction | Paraphrase: chi tiêu y tế năm 2015 của sáu nước, tính theo tỉ lệ GDP, tách thành nguồn công và nguồn tư. |
| Overview | Overall: nhà nước là nguồn chi chính ở năm trên sáu nước, thường với cách biệt rất lớn, riêng USA là ngoại lệ; USA cũng chi nhiều nhất tính tổng, Mexico ít nhất. Không số liệu. |
| Body 1 | Chi công: Japan 9.1%, France 8.6%, Germany 8.4%, USA 8.1%, UK 7.7% (năm nước này chỉ cách nhau 1.4 điểm); Mexico chỉ 3.1%, khoảng một phần ba Japan. |
| Body 2 | Chi tư: USA 8.6% (hơn gấp ba mọi nước khác, nhỉnh hơn chi công của chính nó); còn lại từ 1.7% (Japan) đến 2.8% (Mexico); Mexico lệch chỉ 0.3 điểm. Tổng: USA 16.7% so với Mexico 5.9%. |
The bar chart sets out how much six nations spent on health care in 2015, expressed as a share of GDP and divided into public and private funding.
Overall, the state was the main source of health funding everywhere except the USA, usually by a very wide margin. The USA was also by far the biggest spender in total, while Mexico devoted the smallest share of its national income to health.
Public expenditure was remarkably similar across five of the six nations. Japan topped the list at 9.1% of GDP, followed by France (8.6%), Germany (8.4%), the USA (8.1%) and the UK (7.7%), a spread of only 1.4 percentage points. Mexico lagged far behind, with a government outlay of just 3.1%, roughly a third of the Japanese figure.
Private spending, by contrast, varied enormously. At 8.6% of GDP, the American figure was more than three times that of any other country and narrowly exceeded the nation's own public contribution. Elsewhere, privately funded care amounted to between 1.7% in Japan and 2.8% in Mexico. Mexico was nevertheless the only other country where the two sectors were almost evenly matched, the gap being a mere 0.3 points. Combined, the two categories gave the USA a total of 16.7%, nearly three times Mexico's 5.9%.
| Public expenditure | chi tiêu công |
| topped the list | đứng đầu danh sách |
| lagged far behind | tụt lại rất xa phía sau |
| narrowly exceeded | nhỉnh hơn một chút |
| privately funded care | dịch vụ y tế do tư nhân chi trả |
| almost evenly matched | gần như ngang bằng nhau |
| nearly three times | gần gấp ba lần |